Ms Clinton, Better if you can deal with New Delhi

It sound bullish achievement for Mamata didi to get attention which dragged US Secretary of state Ms Clinton to land here plane at Kolkata, instead of New Delhi. But if we see it from the perspective of cautious diplomacy it is matter of infringement on our own state affairs. How come some foreign minister asks some state/provenience leader to support some policy issue which will enable foreign company to get open up Indian market? It is another blow on part of UPA government who can’t convince its collation partner to support on their reform initiative. Can India not define its diplomatic boundary in which any other government can’t interfere? If similar thing happen to say China, Japan or Israel, its serious conspicuous will be seen in there relation. In fact this state will not allow any other country to do this kind of diplomatic influence which largely focuses on unilateral benefit. Its petty thing on part of S M Krishna – our Honorable External affair minister who is always in highlight for his numerous debacle and miss management in public. So this trend continues and where India’s diplomatic relation lead? Any country having some issue with some part of country they will directly go to respective Chief Minister or leader of that area instead of taking that issue with union government. It’s increasingly seen in various cases where other government trying to influence various local leaders to get rid of the problem they facing. It’s seen rather inefficiency of union government or diplomatic negotiation part of government in handling various issues and sending clear massage regard to it. FDI in retail and Teesta river sharing issue are international issues and seen as issue with national interest, but it’s clearly miss understood my media as well as by government. In the media which is said to be most significant pillar of democracy also not highlighting the issue that why some foreign minister giving more attention to CM instead of Prime Minister of India. Can world also taking Manmohan Singh lead government as puppet government which is work on instruction on other? Is it so then it is serious thing to be understood by UPA leadership to put up strong face in front of world. Leader who have courage, boldness and ability to give up power in interest of people, not merely bargaining with collation partner for the sake of running the coalition government and pushing the reform in sine die situation. India per say leader of future or growth engine of world, can we received this way which show weak nation with unclear leadership. With due respect to Dr Manmohan Singh for his scholastic achievement in the field of Econmics, Mr. Singh its not matter of knowledge you have but how you take to people with it. There some distinguish thing associated with leader and intellect and it look good only when they work according to their ability.